✦ Editorial & Research Transparency ✦

Trust & Methodology Center

Rigorous transparency into our deterministic calculation engines, ephemeris algorithms, calendrical correlations, and cross-tradition mappings.

The 5-Tier Epistemological Truth Standard

OmniZodiac rigorously separates deterministic physical calculation from primary archaeological evidence, scholarly epigraphy, living cultural traditions and indigenous lineages, and modern editorial synthesis:

Tier A: Calculated Astronomical & Mathematical Facts — Planetary and lunar coordinates computed via the analytical VSOP87 solution and ELP2000-82 lunar theory in astronomy-engine v2.1.19 (MIT License), integer Julian Day Number (JDN) conversions via Meeus/Fliegel-Van Flandern, and Purple Mountain Observatory lunisolar tables.
Tier B: Primary Historical Evidence & Classical Texts — Documented archaeological artifacts (Dresden Codex, Senenmut TT353 ceiling, Asyut star tables, Yinxu Oracle Bones, Dunhuang Star Atlas, Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos, Vettius Valens' Anthologies).
Tier C: Scholarly Academic Interpretation & Epigraphy — Peer-reviewed epigraphic decipherments, calendrical correlation models (such as GMT 584283 supported by Thompson 1950 and high-resolution radiocarbon wiggle-matching in Kennett et al. 2013 within 95% confidence intervals), and Egyptological star-clock analyses (Neugebauer & Parker, von Bomhard).
Tier D: Living Cultural Traditions & Living Indigenous Traditions — Active documented living cultural traditions and indigenous lineages, such as contemporary Highland Guatemala K'iche' Maya daykeepers (Ajq'ijab', Barbara Tedlock 1982/1992) and living Chinese seasonal Ganzhi customs, explicitly distinguished from traditions that ceased ritual practice in antiquity (such as Egyptian temple decan cults).
Tier E: Modern OmniZodiac Interpretation & Synthesis — Contemporary psychological archetypes, cross-tradition comparative resonance mappings, and daily self-reflection prompts, strictly distinguished from fatalistic predictions.

Versioned Calculation Engines

Engine / System Version Primary Astronomical / Historical Standard Precision / Tolerance Confidence Tier
Western Astrodynamics v1.2.0 Bretagnon & Francou VSOP87 / ELP2000-82 / Placidus semi-arc < 0.01° rel. to JPL DE440 (Δ ≤ 0.0001°) Tier A (Calculated)
Maya Calendrics v2.0.0 GMT 584283 Correlation / Meeus JDN / 260-day Tzolk'in Exact integer day Tier A (Conversion Arithmetic) / Tier C (GMT Correlation Model)
Egyptian Decans v2.0.0 36 Ecliptic 10° Solar Divisions / Chaldean Planetary Order < 0.01° solar arc Tier A / Tier B
Chinese Lunisolar v1.0.0 60-Year Ganzhi Cycle / Purple Mountain Observatory (1900–2100) Exact LNY boundary Tier A / Tier B
Pythagorean Numerology v1.0.0 20th-Century Period Reduction Method (Campbell 1931) / Master Numbers 11, 22, 33 Exact digit sum Tier E (Modern Framework) / Tier A (Arithmetic)
OmniZodiac Compatibility Index v2.1.0 Harmonic Model (Element 40%, Modality 30%, Aspect 30%; Love includes Polarity 20%) 50–98 bounded index Tier C (Harmonic)
Oracle Fusion Combinator v2.0.0 10-Dimension Cross-Tradition Semantic Resonance Ontology Qualitative synthesis Tier E (Synthesis)
Forecast Engine & Cosmic Clarity v2.2.0 VSOP87 Analytical Ephemeris / Solar House Convention / Aspect Harmonics < 0.01° ecliptic / Exact integer seed Tier A / Tier E
ReadingSnapshot Engine v2.0.0 Canonical JSON Normalization / Cryptographic SHA-256 Checksum 256-bit hash match Tier A (Deterministic)

1. Western Tropical Astrology (VSOP87 & Placidus Trisection)

Western celestial coordinates are computed deterministically using astronomy-engine v2.1.19 (MIT License by Don Cross), implementing the Bretagnon & Francou (1988) VSOP87 analytical solution and Chapront-Touzé & Chapront (1983) ELP2000-82 lunar theory. Apparent geocentric solar ecliptic longitude determines exact Tropical sign cusps (0°–360°) with sub-arcminute physical accuracy (< 0.01°) relative to JPL DE440 standards, and internal computational determinism locked at Δ ≤ 0.0001°.

House Division: True Placidus semi-arc iterative trisection (60 iterations max, < 10⁻⁵° root convergence) and Whole Sign (30° sign-aligned houses). Angles & Obliquity: Ascendant and Midheaven computed via spherical trigonometry with IAU 2006 precession constants.

2. Maya Sacred Calendar (GMT 584283 Correlation)

Maya Tzolk'in and Haab' calculations utilize the scholarly correlation model Goodman-Martínez-Thompson (GMT 584283), supported by epigraphic consensus (Thompson 1950, FAMSI, Martin & Skidmore 2012) and high-resolution radiocarbon wiggle-matching of Tikal sapodilla lintels within 95% confidence intervals (Kennett et al. 2013). While the conversion arithmetic conditional on this correlation is deterministic (Tier A), the choice of correlation constant represents a scholarly model (Tier C). Dates are converted via the Fliegel-Van Flandern / Meeus JDN algorithm to map the 260-day sacred count (20 Nawales × 13 Tones), 365-day solar Haab' calendar, and 5-period Long Count, aligning with living ritual daykeeping documented among contemporary Highland Kʼicheʼ Ajqʼijabʼ (Barbara Tedlock 1982/1992).

3. Egyptian Decanal System (36 Decans & Chaldean Order)

Egyptian decan assignments distinguish ancient Middle Kingdom indigenous 36-star sidereal clocks (baktiu) from the later Hellenistic/Ptolemaic ecliptic division into 36 equal 10° solar sectors starting at 0° Aries, while indigenous Pharaonic decanal star clocks are referenced from Neugebauer & Parker (1960–1969). Planetary rulers follow the authentic Chaldean descending orbital sequence (Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Sun, Venus, Mercury, Moon) recorded in Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos and Vettius Valens' Anthologies.

4. Chinese Lunisolar Sexagenary Cycle (Purple Mountain Data)

Chinese zodiac animal signs, fixed elements (Wood, Fire, Earth, Metal, Water), and Yin/Yang polarities map directly to the 60-year Lunisolar Sexagenary cycle (Ganzhi). Methodologically, we rigorously distinguish two distinct boundaries: the civil Lunar New Year (Chunjie, the astronomical new moon of the 1st lunar month derived from Purple Mountain Observatory data) and the traditional astrometric solar term Lichun (solar longitude λ = 315°), when the solar Ganzhi year pillar transitions in classical Chinese astronomy, avoiding any arbitrary January 1st assumptions.

5. Pythagorean Numerology (Period Reduction Method)

Life Path numbers are computed using the 20th-century Period Reduction Method (Campbell 1931 / Balliett 1908), reducing birth month, day, and year individually before summing. This distinguishes modern base-9 reduction and preserved Master Numbers 11, 22, and 33 from ancient Pythagorean harmonic ratios (Tetractys and monochord intervals).

6. OmniZodiac Compatibility Index (Harmonic Model v2.1.0)

Our compatibility scores are computed via a symmetric, deterministic astrological harmonic model codified in CompatibilitySpec v2.1.0. Overall compatibility synthesizes Element Synergy (40%), Modality Dynamics (30%), and Harmonic Aspect Angle (30%), with scores strictly bounded in [50, 98]. Romantic synergy incorporates Polarity Alignment (20%). Published percentages represent an astrological compatibility index, not an empirical guarantee or prediction of relationship outcome.

Mathematical Form: S_overall = round(clamp(0.40 × E + 0.30 × M + 0.30 × A, 50, 98)), where E, M, and A are deterministic astrological factors in [50, 98]. Symmetry Invariant: S(A, B) = S(B, A) across all 144 sign combinations. Version v2.1.0 forms the single source of truth across algorithms, UI components, PDF exports, and structured data.

7. Deterministic Forecast Engine, Cosmic Clarity & Harmonic Numbers (Engine v2.2.0)

OmniZodiac's multi-period forecast engine synthesizes analytical planetary ephemeris (VSOP87) with the classical Solar House system across 9 distinct forecast horizons: Daily, Tomorrow, Weekly, Monthly, Yearly, Love, Career, Money, and Wellness. Our engine strictly separates calculated celestial motions from interpretive contemplation, guaranteeing zero fatalistic predictions and zero speculative claims.

Solar House System vs. Natal Chart: Forecasts place the tropical Sun sign on the 1st Solar House cusp, measuring active transits through consecutive 30° solar sectors. This traditional framework is publicly distinguished from individualized natal charts, which require verified exact birth times and geographical coordinates to establish true topocentric Ascendant and house cusps. Cosmic Clarity Aspect Geometry Algorithm: Daily clarity ratings evaluate active planetary transit aspects (conjunction, sextile, square, trine, opposition) interacting with the sign's solar degrees. Trines and sextiles contribute harmonious aspect weights (+1), squares and oppositions introduce developmental friction weights (-1), and conjunctions are modulated by the planetary nature of the transiting bodies. The aggregate raw score is normalized onto a discrete 3–5 star contemplative scale, producing deterministic variance across dates and signs without artificial inflation or sensational negativity. Harmonic Focus Numbers Methodology: Focus numbers are deterministically generated from active planetary orbital frequencies, daily lunar phase indices, and calendar seeds through modular arithmetic. They serve exclusively as reflective mindfulness anchors and contemplative symbols, never as empirical lottery predictions, financial guidance, or games-of-chance forecasts. Deterministic Reproducibility & SHA-256 Provenance: Every generated forecast produces an immutable, cryptographically verifiable SHA-256 fact-set checksum, ensuring complete replayability across web, mobile viewports, localized editions, and client-side vector PDF exports.

Primary Archaeological & Documentary Evidence

Every traditional astrological system represented on OmniZodiac is grounded in verified documentary and archaeological artifacts. Below are the primary historical manuscripts, stone stelae, and architectural ephemeris alignments that inform our calculation algorithms.

Authoritative Primary Sources & Research Bibliography

OmniZodiac calculation models and cross-tradition taxonomies derive directly from published academic monographs, ephemerides, and primary epigraphic collections. Below is the crawlable reference bibliography:

VSOP87 Planetary Solution 1988 CE · Bureau des Longitudes, Paris, France

Bretagnon, P. & Francou, G. (1988). Planetary theories in rectangular and spherical variables: VSOP87 solutions. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 202(1–2), 309–315.

Repository / Publisher: Astronomy & Astrophysics / CDS Strasbourg · Access Source Record ↗
ELP 2000-82 Lunar Theory 1983 CE · Bureau des Longitudes, Paris, France

Chapront-Touzé, M. & Chapront, J. (1983). The lunar ephemeris ELP 2000. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 124(1), 50–62.

Repository / Publisher: Astronomy & Astrophysics · Access Source Record ↗
Meeus Astronomical Algorithms 1991 / 1998 CE · Richmond, Virginia, USA

Meeus, J. (1998). Astronomical Algorithms (2nd ed.). Willmann-Bell, Inc.

Repository / Publisher: Willmann-Bell, Inc.
Astronomy Engine v2.1.19 2020–2026 CE · Open Source Software Archive

Cross, D. (2020). Astronomy Engine: Precise positional astronomy algorithms in C, C#, Python, and JavaScript. MIT License.

Repository / Publisher: Don Cross / GitHub · Access Source Record ↗
IANA Time Zone Database Continuously maintained (1986–present) · Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)

Eggert, P., & Olson, A. D. (2026). Sources for time zone and daylight saving time data. Internet Assigned Numbers Authority.

Repository / Publisher: IANA / ICANN · Access Source Record ↗
Ptolemy: Tetrabiblos c. 150 CE · Alexandria, Roman Egypt

Ptolemy, C. (1940). Tetrabiblos (F. E. Robbins, Ed. & Trans.). Harvard University Press (Loeb Classical Library No. 435).

Repository / Publisher: Loeb Classical Library (Harvard University Press) / Bibliotheca Teubneriana · Access Source Record ↗
Vettius Valens: Anthologies c. 150–175 CE · Antioch / Alexandria

Valens, V. (1986). Vettii Valentis Antiocheni Anthologiarum libri novem (D. Pingree, Ed.). B. G. Teubner.

Repository / Publisher: Teubner (ed. David Pingree 1986)
Placidus: Primum Mobile 1650 / 1657 CE · Padua, Republic of Venice

de Titis, P. (1657). Primum Mobile: Complectens theoriis et canonibus extrinsecis in tabulis directoriis. Padua.

Repository / Publisher: Historic editions ed. John Cooper (1814)
Dresden Codex Hieroglyphic Manuscript c. 1200–1250 CE (Postclassic Maya; derived from Classic prototypes c. 700–900 CE) · Northern Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico

Sächsische Landesbibliothek – Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Dresden. (n.d.). Codex Dresdensis (Mscr. Dresd. Ch. 1). Dresden, Germany.

Repository / Publisher: Saxon State and University Library Dresden (SLUB), Germany · Access Source Record ↗
Quiriguá Stela C Creation Inscription 775 CE (Dedicated 9.17.5.0.0 6 Ajaw 13 Kʼayab) · Quiriguá Archaeological Park, Motagua Valley, Izabal, Guatemala

Sharer, R. J. (1990). Quiriguá: A Classic Maya Center and Its Sculptures. Carolina Academic Press.

Repository / Publisher: In situ Monument, UNESCO World Heritage Site · Access Source Record ↗
Copán Altar Q Monument 776 CE (Dedicated 9.17.5.3.4) · Structure 16 West Terrace, Copán Acropolis, Honduras

Fash, B. W. (1992). Late Classic Maya stone sculpture from Copán, Honduras. In Classic Maya Political History (pp. 204–235). Cambridge University Press.

Repository / Publisher: Copán Sculpture Museum / UNESCO World Heritage Site · Access Source Record ↗
El Caracol Observatory Structure c. 800–1000 CE (Terminal Classic Maya) · Chichén Itzá, Yucatán, Mexico

Aveni, A. F., Gibbs, S. L., & Hartung, H. (1975). The Caracol, the observatory at Chichen Itza: An astronomical analysis. Science, 188(4192), 977–985.

Repository / Publisher: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH), Mexico / UNESCO World Heritage Site · Access Source Record ↗

Precision, Edge Cases & Known Limitations

  • Polar Latitudes (|lat| ≥ 66.56°): Under extreme arctic/antarctic coordinates where celestial semi-arcs do not intersect the horizon, our Placidus house engine automatically and gracefully falls back to Equal House division without layout shifts or NaN values.
  • Missing Birth Time: When birth time is unspecified, our system calculates planetary longitudes for 12:00 UTC and computes a rigorous 24-hour Moon span to qualify whether the Moon changed signs during the calendar date. Authoritative Ascendant (Rising sign), Midheaven (MC), and house cusps are omitted entirely to prevent fabricating speculative angles.
  • Missing or Ambiguous Birth Location: When location is unspecified, local horizon angles (Rising/MC/houses) are omitted entirely (never defaulted to 0° UTC / Greenwich). Planetary placements are computed in the geocentric ecliptic reference frame with an explicit geocentric advisory.
  • Historical Timezones & Daylight Saving Time: Dates and coordinates are resolved via the canonical IANA timezone database using native Intl.DateTimeFormat UTC offset resolution, supporting historical war time (WWII War Time, British Double Summer Time), non-hourly timezones (e.g., India +5:30, Nepal +5:45), and seasonal DST transitions without naive longitude approximations. Birth dates preceding the standardization of civil railway time zones (e.g., pre-1883 in the US, pre-1880 in Britain, pre-1893 in Germany) are classified as historical Local Mean Time (LMT) and transparently flagged with an advisory notice.
  • Zero Scientific Prediction Claims: OmniZodiac does not provide medical diagnoses, legal counsel, financial forecasts, or fatalistic mortality predictions.

Corrections Policy & Ephemeral Privacy

We invite academic, astronomical, and user scrutiny. If you discover a mathematical discrepancy or historical error, please review our Corrections Policy and submit a report for prompt verification.

100% Client-Side & Strictly Browser-Local Privacy: All birth data calculations execute 100% locally in your client device browser (with zero server processing, zero serverless function endpoints, and zero remote logging of personal coordinates or birth times). Personal birth details are never saved, stored, or transmitted.

Geographical Data & Timezone Reference (GeoNames CC BY 4.0)

Worldwide city coordinates, administrative subdivisions, population ranks, and canonical IANA timezone associations are derived from the GeoNames Geographical Database under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).

All geospatial search indices and historical timezone resolution calculations run 100% locally and offline in the user's browser without sending typed queries or birth locations to external geocoding servers.

CALCULATED RESULT

How This Page Was Produced

Multi-layer production transparency, algorithmic rigor, and review status.

Mode A: Deterministic Calculation
Content Production Mode

Algorithmic astronomical and calendrical computations (VSOP87, ELP2000, topocentric house cusps, Maya Long Count GMT 584283 correlation model, Chinese Ganzhi, modern Pythagorean reduction). Fully deterministic, client-side only, bit-for-bit reproducible.

Standard:Mathematical algorithms and peer-reviewed astronomical theories. Zero server PII.
Mathematical Calculation Rigor

Calculations executed client-side via astronomy-engine v2.1.19 (VSOP87 / ELP2000-82) with zero server birth data transmission. Mathematical algorithms adhere to peer-reviewed astronomical standards.

Independent Human Review

This page was produced via deterministic algorithms and literature synthesis without an independent external human review record.

Ancient traditions. Documented sources. Modern calculations. Transparent interpretation.

"OmniZodiac draws on documented historical traditions, published scholarship, primary-source material where available, and modern astronomical and calendrical calculation methods. Some systems discussed on the site have roots in antiquity, while others developed later or include modern interpretive layers. OmniZodiac works to distinguish those layers clearly and provides supporting sources and methodology where appropriate."